Comments on: Building a $100 a Day Automatic Income Generating Website

By: hiii

hiii — Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:23:07 +0000

so how do i Building a $100 a Day Automatic Income Generating Website

By: Online Sales

Online Sales — Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:30:51 +0000

I can agree with you in some circumstances as many ebooks and systems do have real value. However I really refer to the types of info-products and system that The Salty Droid so eloquently details.

By: Gab

Gab — Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:34:33 +0000

” Why would they really make it easy for you to take the bread off their table? For $97, $77$ – no just $57 if you act now”

They’d do that (assuming we give them the benefit of the doubt) because they see that the market is big enough for more than one person to play in it. It’s also usually good for relationship building.

By: Author

Author — Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:21:34 +0000

Excellent read here…
You hit the nail right on the head. What’s going to get you there is Keyword rich content and SEO from the SERPS.
As long as those pages are full of your own content and keywords!!!

By: Online Sales

Online Sales — Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:52:38 +0000

Cheers Marty, you’re always more than welcome to drop quality links like the above… just lay off on that v1agr4 spam you keep doing

By: Martypants

Martypants — Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:19:47 +0000

Great post, Liam…I gotta stop going on vacation – look at all the goings-on I missed.
But I agree – Simple still works. I just posted something about this kinda, and it was inspired by a guy who then commented on the drooid’s site about it…Un-link it, if I am being too pushy: http://www.articulayers.com/2010/11/sidestepping-unicorn-turds/
Cheers man…thanks for the read.

By: Online Sales

Online Sales — Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:59:17 +0000

You’re so right Sarah. Sometimes I see so much focus put on third party web 2.0 sites to keep the links from there followed, if that energy put into producing new relevant content and real marketing it would be far more beneficial. Both to those sites, and to the web in general.

By: Sarah Harris

Sarah Harris — Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:16:44 +0000

I think the game is changing so much and it’s going to force publishers to step it up a bit. I totally agree with a lot of the points made here. Everyone is so concerned with their Hub Pages, Ezines, Facebook, Twitter, etc. Perhaps if more of the focus was put towards the actual site rather than all of this external crap, everything else would naturally fall into place behind it. It’s not that you need to neglect external accounts all together but it’s probably a safer bet to put more energy into your actual site.

By: Online Sales

Online Sales — Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:27:58 +0000

I agree with you 100% Bromley. With a few exceptional articles that are marketed heavily then the rest can almost be filler content which will rank on the coat tails of the links the exceptional articles earn.

By: Bromley

Bromley — Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:16:20 +0000

Great post. Tell it like it is. I look forward to part 2.

Just one comment on the process you outline. (I’ve broken out a couple of steps to aid my point.)

1. “Build a website”
“Decent content, not stellar, not exceptional, not even good. Decent is all that is required. If you go above and beyond decent into good then all the better for you.”

2. “get people linking to it”

Going above and beyond decent can really help with step 2 – getting people to link to it. In my experience, really linkable content can make link-building so much easier.

Though I don’t mean to suggest that extremely high quality is necessarily best – there’s a balance to be struck and it partly depends on how you’re getting people to link to you. I don’t really buy the idea that great content attracts links of its own accord – you usually need to give it a push of some sort. Great content just tends to make the pushing easier.